More Pages: Howard Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100


An excellent and well-researched book

Confederate VixenHere starts the beginnings of a wonderful romance, between Kinsey and Chap. Through many ups and downs, the two find love. The characters are well-developed and the plot keeps you turning the pages. There also a couple secondary romances and as well as the use of the Abraham Lincoln family as a part of the story. I have found a new author whose books I will devour. I don't see any books from her after 1994 and only four by her before then. Oh no, does that mean she has stopped writing, if her other 3 books are as delightful as this one, I surely don't understand it.


Review of Confucius

If I know now what I should have known years ago...

Excellent Book!

The best revisionist work on the Lochner Court I've seenGillman begins with a clear thesis: that the Lochner era jurisprudence was grounded in a constitutional tradition rooted in the founders' desire to form a faction free republic. This tradition held that the states' police powers could only be used in a neutral manner to benefit the general welfare; that the state couldn't use its regulatory power to benefit one faction only. This tradition was based on the assumption that the American economy could provide for everyone in a manner that would protect against social dependency as experienced in Europe. Gillman traces this legal tradition from the founders through the nineteenth century and up to the final demise in 1937. Gillman places the Lochner decision in the context of this tradition and explains that it wasn't really motivated by laissez-faire market views but instead was a good faith attempt to preserve a tradition that was increasingly undermined by the changing industrial relations of America. This work is well worth the read for anyone interested in American constitutional history.
One final word of praise. Gillman is not interested in justifying and resurrecting Lochner in the modern day, as some economic rights activists have called for. Instead he is focused on defusing the claim that the Lochner era was one of rampant judicial activism. Gillman succeeds admirably in his task.


A Good Intermediate Text

Grab it and go!

Extremely witty and subtle; he's obviously been there.

Sanity in short sentences